Linked by David Adams on Thu 20th Nov 2008 04:26 UTC
Novell and Ximian Two years ago, Microsoft and Novell inked a landmark deal on patents and Linux-to-Windows interoperability. According to Microsoft and Novell, it's a deal that has shown dramatic momentum in its second year, with a triple digit percentage increase in customers for a total tally of more than 200 customers. "I was surprised at the number of over 200 customers, so I actually went back and double checked it just to make sure," Susan Heystee, General Manager for Global Strategic Alliances at Novell told InternetNews.com. "That represents over 250 percent growth in terms of the number of customers that are part of the partnership which is really great. A real positive surprise has been the great customer momentum."
Thread beginning with comment 337956
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Good for them.
by DrillSgt on Fri 21st Nov 2008 02:43 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Good for them."
DrillSgt
Member since:
2005-12-02

"In contrast, the Microsoft covenant not to sue is a covenant not to sue Novell or Novell's customers."

Well, there actually is much more to it than that if you read the documents. Microsft has also pledged in those documents not to sue anyone who is a non-compensated developer, or anyone who contributes to the code used in OpenSuse. I would think that pretty much says they can't sue anyone. Personally I believe there is no difference between the 2 covenants. Of course, I have been wrong and certainly will be wrong on things to come. Who knows..I will start to worry if Microsoft does something they have never done before, which is sue someone for any type of patent infringement. I would like to point out that I despise software patents, and if they must exist, they should be subject to the same rules as patents on a physical item. Meaning schematics/blueprints must be submitted, and that is what is patented, not the idea itself. In other words, they should not exist.

http://www.microsoft.com/interop/msnovellcollab/community.mspx

EDIT: Added the link to the document.

Edited 2008-11-21 02:44 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Good for them.
by lemur2 on Fri 21st Nov 2008 03:15 in reply to "RE[5]: Good for them."
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

Microsft has also pledged in those documents not to sue anyone who is a non-compensated developer, or anyone who contributes to the code used in OpenSuse. I would think that pretty much says they can't sue anyone.


There are a lot of people who do not fit into the category of "non-compensated developer, or anyone who contributes to the code used in OpenSuse". Most of the people in the world fit outside that description, actually.

If Microsft actually meant "we won't sue anyone as long as they don't sue us" ... then why didn't they just say "we won't sue anyone as long as they don't sue us" as Sun did?

Food for thought, surely?

If Microsoft had actually said "we won't sue anyone as long as they don't sue us", just as Sun did, what would be "in it" for Novell?

If there is actually something about this deal for Novell, some real benefit to be had, where Micrsoft has said "we won't sue you, or people who contribute to your projects" ... doesn't that strongly imply that Microsoft have effectively promised that they WILL sue other parties? If not so ... as I say ... what is in it for Novell?

Personally I believe there is no difference between the 2 covenants. Of course, I have been wrong and certainly will be wrong on things to come. Who knows..I will start to worry if Microsoft does something they have never done before, which is sue someone for any type of patent infringement.


I will start to worry when Microsoft start to try to charge people for running code that Microsoft didn't actually write ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_tax#Licensing_agreements

http://aroundcny.com/technofile/texts/bit052202.html

... oh wait.

Edited 2008-11-21 03:16 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Good for them.
by DrillSgt on Fri 21st Nov 2008 03:54 in reply to "RE[6]: Good for them."
DrillSgt Member since:
2005-12-02

"I will start to worry when Microsoft start to try to charge people for running code that Microsoft didn't actually write ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_tax#Licensing_agreements

http://aroundcny.com/technofile/texts/bit052202.html

... oh wait."


I don't know what they wrote of anything. Thanks for the first link, very educational. As with every software/hardware company they buy other companies, and sell the product as their own. Is the way of the business world, and if I were to dig I can guarantee I would find Sun and IBM having done the same thing. I don't have the energy to do that currently ;)

As for the second link, OEM licenses purchased with a computer system need to stay with the system. That does not mean however that is the OS that must be on them, and the license is paid for with the system, and has never had to be paid again. I really have no idea what that version 3.0 educational license had written in it, I do however know that is not the case any longer, and the license agreement no longer calls for that.

http://www.microsoft.com/education/terms.mspx

No, I am not defending Microsoft, Linux, *BSD, etc. I use them all, and they all have a place.

I guess my main point is that IBM, Sun, and even Microsoft, are heading to do everything with standards. Whether it came about due to legal issues or not, I don't care. I do just care that it is happening.

I do respect your thoughts on it all. Last reply in this thread though as I have taken it OT, so really should be modded down.

Reply Parent Score: 2