Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 21st Nov 2008 00:11 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Windows Every now and then, an article pops up which argues that it would make sense for Microsoft to offer a free, ad-powered version of Windows. "We are all aware that Google is the king of online advertising. Microsoft has wanted to compete in that space forever, which is why giving away Windows 7 makes so much sense," Business Pundit argues, "Let's look at the numbers; Microsoft's operating systems are on 90% of the world's computers, or roughly one billion machines. That's penetration on a massive scale. Even Google has to be impressed." While these articles make some valid points, they rarely dive into the actual details.
Thread beginning with comment 337995
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Grasping at straws...
by Adurbe on Fri 21st Nov 2008 16:45 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Grasping at straws..."
Adurbe
Member since:
2005-07-06

Its 'catch up' in the respect it included tabs, rss and security :-p

IE7 is good enough that many people done HAVE to switch to firefox or anything else

My point was really that Microsoft only inovate when they have competion and 'something to beat'

IE 6 is an example, in my opinion, of a product that was allowed to stagnate because of the lack of anything credible to compete against at the time

Remember that firefox (Phoenix) wasnt even yet around when ie 6 came out and netscape were basically dead

Reply Parent Score: 3

StaubSaugerNZ Member since:
2007-07-13

Remember that firefox (Phoenix) wasnt even yet around when ie 6 came out and netscape were basically dead


Utter rubbish. Plenty of us were using 'Mozilla' long before Firefox was split off. Just because The Followers didn't know about it doesn't mean the Early Adopters weren't aware of it.

Reply Parent Score: 2

modmans2ndcoming Member since:
2005-11-09

The point is that Mozy was a pile of turd and could not compete with IE 6. it took a retooling of the mozy code to create firefox and start throwign punches back at MS.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: Grasping at straws...
by rajan r on Sat 22nd Nov 2008 06:39 in reply to "RE[4]: Grasping at straws..."
rajan r Member since:
2005-07-27

Uhm, people did know about Mozilla. Seamonkey-based Netscape 6 did horribly in the market (and probably sealed Netscape's fate), as did most early versions of Seamonkey. There was a reason why Firefox eventually replaced Seamonkey: Seamonkey was slow and buggy.

Reply Parent Score: 1

BluenoseJake Member since:
2005-08-11

Early adopters are not, and never have been, MS's core target audience.

Reply Parent Score: 2