Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 22nd Nov 2008 18:52 UTC
Apple "I'm about to tell you a true story. It's not about me (honest). I have this friend who submitted an application to Apple for review. After a few weeks, it came back with one of those embarrassingly stupid rejection letters that said more about the person reviewing the application than it did about the application itself. In a nutshell, the application violated one of those user interaction rules that seem to exist in certain pompous minds rather than in the actual Apple Human Interface Guidelines. [...] After a day or so of calming down, this person decided to go ahead and resubmit the application. And did so without making a single change to the application. I'm sure you know where this is going."
Thread beginning with comment 338088
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Feedback forbidden ?
by seasonfive on Sat 22nd Nov 2008 19:58 UTC
seasonfive
Member since:
2008-11-22

I thought Apple forbid developpers to give any details about the acceptance or not of application in the AppStore ? This is probably the reason why no name is mentioned. Then, is this article still credible ? Any feedback ? :-)

Reply Score: 2

RE: Feedback forbidden ?
by aaronb on Sat 22nd Nov 2008 22:54 in reply to "Feedback forbidden ?"
aaronb Member since:
2005-07-06

I think Apple changed that policy due to developer irritation.

http://www.osnews.com/story/20347/

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: Feedback forbidden ?
by sbergman27 on Sun 23rd Nov 2008 01:32 in reply to "RE: Feedback forbidden ?"
sbergman27 Member since:
2005-07-24

I think Apple changed that policy due to developer irritation.

Because "The beatings will continue until morale improves" didn't seem to be working. You've got to admire management which takes such an empirical and pragmatic approach. ;-)

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE: Feedback forbidden ?
by DeadFishMan on Sun 23rd Nov 2008 14:05 in reply to "Feedback forbidden ?"
DeadFishMan Member since:
2006-01-09

I thought Apple forbid developpers to give any details about the acceptance or not of application in the AppStore ? This is probably the reason why no name is mentioned. Then, is this article still credible ? Any feedback ? :-)


Erica Sadun is a very well known developer in some iPhone/iPod Touch circles and already has one or two books explaining in details how to hack your iPod Touch/iPhone to its fullest extent in her resume (I've got one and learned a few tricks about my iPod Touch that I really haven't seen anywhere else) so I'm inclined to believe that this is true and that the reason that the developer's name is not mentioned at all must be due to Apple's draconian rules.

Ars really seem to be the kind of website that attracts people truly knowledgeable about their area of expertise to expedite its articles...

Edited 2008-11-23 14:05 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE: Feedback forbidden ?
by Imagine Engine on Sun 23rd Nov 2008 17:42 in reply to "Feedback forbidden ?"
Imagine Engine Member since:
2008-11-23

Apple can't stop a developer from telling the public why they were not approved for the App Store or why their app was pulled from the App Store. From the emailed responses I got from several third party developers it's frustrating to them why some of their apps are either blocked or removed. Nullriver's NetShare app is one such good example whereby it seems only AT&T is against their customers tethering on the iPhone. Rogers and Fido here in Canada allow tethering on their smartphone data plans, so does several other international carriers that sell the iPhone 3G. Though Apple seems to continually listen to AT&T input instead of letting the consumer make up their mind on which app they would like to download.

Reply Parent Score: 2