Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 22nd Nov 2008 17:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 338196
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Linux distros are still small
by Piranha on Mon 24th Nov 2008 20:41
in reply to "RE[4]: Linux distros are still small"
Except when you 'install' on a hard drive, it bloats out. So when talking about OS' bloatness (which is what this topic is about), you're comparing compressed to non-compressed.
Sure, it runs, but you can also enable compression on NTFS partitions. However, nobody wants to do this since it usually makes the system sluggish. It's true that 'some' compressions make reads/writes faster (at the expense of CPU cycles), but usually isn't the best compression technique out there.
RE[6]: Linux distros are still small
by sbergman27 on Mon 24th Nov 2008 21:10
in reply to "RE[5]: Linux distros are still small"
Except when you 'install' on a hard drive, it bloats out.
Andrew,
Of course the installed image is larger than the compressed installation image; Surely any OSNews reader should recognize that implicitly without anyone having to jump in to share that startling "insight".
Anyway, IIRC, the installed OS is about 1.5GB. Not bad at all by 2008 standards. By comparison, I believe Vista requires about "a 20GB disk with at least 15GB available free space". About a 10 fold difference. Even with NTFS compression, you're never going to get that within a factor of 5 of Ubuntu's installation size. Even Windows advocates in this thread have admitted that you'd never squeeze it onto an 8GB SSD.
Edit: And why did I even bother to type all this out, anyway?
Edited 2008-11-24 21:16 UTC





Member since:
2005-07-24
Not to be contrary. But I said:
"""
Even the x86_64 version of Ubuntu still fits on, and can run from, a single CD. That's the full version and not some cut down version.
"""
That is all *completely* correct and not just partially correct.