Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 25th Nov 2008 01:50 UTC, submitted by judgen
Legal "Federal district judge Dale A. Kimball has handed down the final judgment in the SCO case. The decision dismisses SCO's latest claims, grants declaratory relief to Novell, and sustains the court's previous judgment that SCO owes Novell over $2.54 million (plus interest) for unjust enrichment."
Thread beginning with comment 338248
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: serves them right
by Athlander on Tue 25th Nov 2008 09:13 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: serves them right"
Athlander
Member since:
2008-03-10


I'd imagine that those SCOG employess had been offered shares to stay on ... a ticket in SCOGs litigation lottery if you will ... I can't think of any reason any self-respecting technical person would choose to stay otherwise. They had 4+ years worth of opportunity to leave.


I can think of plenty of reasons why a self-respecting technical person would choose to stay.
In the grand scheme of things, the actions of SCO are quite harmless compared to the activities of some other corporations. Perhaps it is a sad indictment of the modern world that people are willing to work for weapons manufacturers, fast food chains, coffee chains or [insert evil corporation of choice] but it is the real world. People have mortgages to pay and not everyone can quit a job on Friday and be back working on Monday. For some folk, feeding their children is more important than Linux and FOSS. I wonder how old you are, because your priorities and attitude seem a bit "adolescent".

I can understand someone being passionate about Linux and FOSS, but as sbergman27 pointed out, your comments are quite vindictive. To me, you sound like you are equating the rank and file employees of SCO with collaborators of a murderous regime.

The only way to stop things like this happening is to make the people at board level personally responsible. CEOs and directors can flit from one company to another, leaving a trail of lawsuits, bankruptcies and lost jobs. It's not just the USA, it happens everywhere. To take pleasure in the fact that people lower in an organisation, who don't make policy decisions, can (or should) lose their jobs, shows the same level of callousness that motivated the McBride and Sontag.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[6]: serves them right
by lemur2 on Tue 25th Nov 2008 09:54 in reply to "RE[5]: serves them right"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

The only way to stop things like this happening is to make the people at board level personally responsible. CEOs and directors can flit from one company to another, leaving a trail of lawsuits, bankruptcies and lost jobs. It's not just the USA, it happens everywhere.


Exactly so. I hope the CEOs and other suits who dreamt up this SCOG scam lose their shirts and forevermore have to live in poverty. The lawyers can have some of that action also.

To take pleasure in the fact that people lower in an organisation, who don't make policy decisions, can (or should) lose their jobs, shows the same level of callousness that motivated the McBride and Sontag.


WTF??

Hopefully the former SCOG people who had nothing to do with the scam can get a decent job elsewhere immediately. Who on earth would want otherwise?

The fact that there would be no job future at SCOG should have been obvious for years to even the most junior of SCOG employees.

http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=SCOXQ.PK#chart1:symbol=scoxq.pk;...

There are not many companies that keep going after dropping from $20 down to $0.13 and then declaring bankruptcy, with four deadset loser court actions still on their books.

Anybody at SCOG with even a modicum of sense will have another job lined up.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[7]: serves them right
by jptros on Tue 25th Nov 2008 20:01 in reply to "RE[6]: serves them right"
jptros Member since:
2005-08-26

Hopefully the former SCOG people who had nothing to do with the scam can get a decent job elsewhere immediately. Who on earth would want otherwise?

Some people invest lots of time and effort into a project so much that it's their passion to keep working on it even if they don't own it. That may or may not describe some of the people that stayed behind, but it's a possibility. There are a number of possibilities. Besides, getting a new job is easy anyway, especially with a global economic crisis shadowing above. I even had a dream a little over a week ago that Sun was laying off 6000 people... wait, I think that was a dream.

Reply Parent Score: 2