Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 25th Nov 2008 21:57 UTC, submitted by Moulinneuf
Legal As most of you will know, Microsoft is currently involved in a class-action lawsuit about the company possibly misleading its customers about which computers could run Windows Vista. The story goes that when Microsoft delayed Windows Vista they allowed computers makers to label existing stock as "Vista Capable", even though these computers could only run the basic, Aero Glass-less version of Vista. The most recent development is that Microsoft's CEO Steve Ballmer will be questioned under oath.
Thread beginning with comment 338378
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Basic
by PortResi on Wed 26th Nov 2008 05:52 UTC in reply to "Basic"
PortResi
Member since:
2008-10-06

Personally I've come to interpret that Vista Basic sticker as meaning thoroughly miserable computing experience avoid if possible.


My primary platforms are OS X and Debian GNU/Linux. At work, I tried to run the latest incarnation of windows on a new Dell PC with 512 and its performance was, well, less than expected. It cached itself constantly. This was even after expanding the swap size.

I don't believe Ballmer and all are true criminals. But if you tell your OEMs that their machines are compatible then Micro should pay up to the OEMs and any others who were subject to potential false advertisements.

Edited 2008-11-26 05:52 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Basic
by Machster on Wed 26th Nov 2008 17:29 in reply to "RE: Basic"
Machster Member since:
2007-05-15

But don't the OEMs also have a responsibility to their customers to test their own product with Vista before they sell it?

Edited 2008-11-26 17:32 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2