Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Nov 2008 09:28 UTC, submitted by caffeine deprived
Thread beginning with comment 338411
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: A competitor to the Nokia N810? Not likely.
by HeLfReZ on Wed 26th Nov 2008 14:12
in reply to "A competitor to the Nokia N810? Not likely."
If the mid is shooting for the $600 range, i dont see it going to far. Before I pay ~$600 for a MID, it would make more sense to go with a loaded netbook. You can get a N810 for $200 fairly easy, and a N800 for 100-150. The battery life on the N810 is about 6-7hrs under heavy used, and it can literally go a week under light usage.
RE[2]: A competitor to the Nokia N810? Not likely.
by dagw on Wed 26th Nov 2008 15:07
in reply to "RE: A competitor to the Nokia N810? Not likely."
If the mid is shooting for the $600 range,
I suspect it will come down. And anyway if I can get one cheap with a data plan, that would be OK too. Still all the being said and done, I'd still be tempted at $600.
You can get a N810 for $200 fairly easy
I can't. I've looked but I've never seen one I could get for much less than $350. But then again I don't live in the US. At $200 I'd certainly buy one.
Edited 2008-11-26 15:11 UTC






Member since:
2005-06-29
The Nokia devices are at an entirely different price point. The Gigabyte MIDs appear to be going for ~$600 without a service plan. The N810 costs half that.
I couldn't find numbers on battery life, but knowing that ARM processors get significantly better performance/watt, the Nokia's likely have a much better battery life, as well.