Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 19th Sep 2005 20:33 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 33849
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Not a microkernel
by kaiwai on Tue 20th Sep 2005 06:03
in reply to "RE[3]: Not a microkernel"






Member since:
2005-08-08
> However, computers have now come to the point that the penalty of contextual switching should be so small, so meaningless
A very small overhead, when called very often, is indeed a big overhead.