Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Nov 2008 21:45 UTC, submitted by lemur2
Thread beginning with comment 338569
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2007-11-17
I guess it is safe to assume, that steve grasps the concepts behind the cathedral and the bazaar.
What we are still discussing is, whether a project
a.) is allowd to formulate a set of (probably non-traditional) milestones
b.) optionally change/adapt/reformulate this milestones during development
c.) communicate the (final) requirements, feature matrices, etc. resulting from these milestones
d.) release the software when they *think* they have reached the required level of completeness and
e.) slap a label like "4.0" on the resulting code / product / whatever.
KDE 4.0 was communicated to "eat your children". KDE 4.1 was released backgrounded by "early adopters can now start to switch to it for everyday work". I don't think that we should mandate all (FOSS) projects have to agree on the same criteria for major releases.
EDIT: Just in case this was not clear from my comment:
I think the KDE devs did the right thing to get the thing out of the door early. And I have dealed with too many .0 releases in the past to have any illusions left about "if its .0, it is gold".
Edited 2008-11-28 11:06 UTC