Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 1st Dec 2008 23:31 UTC, submitted by linuxlinks
Window Managers "Mainstream Linux distributions typically default to one of two desktop environments, KDE or GNOME. Both of these environments provide users with an intuitive and attractive desktop, as well as offering a large raft of multimedia software, games, administration programs, network tools, educational applications, utilities, artwork, web development tools and more. However, these two desktops focus more on providing users with a modern computing environment with all the bells and whistles featured in Windows Vista, rather than minimising the amount of system resources they need. For users and developers who want to run an attractive Linux desktop on older hardware, netbooks, or mobile internet devices, neither KDE or GNOME may be a viable option, as they run too slowly on low spec machines (such as less than 256MB RAM and a 1 GHz processor). This article seeks to identify the best lean desktops for Linux, for users that have old or even ancient hardware."
Thread beginning with comment 338848
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
ok this just confuses me
by poundsmack on Mon 1st Dec 2008 23:53 UTC
poundsmack
Member since:
2005-07-13

sooooo many light weight distro's are based on GTK2 but i can't think of a single other (aside from KDE obviously) that is based on QT. If I had to start making an alternative GUI it would be QT, hands down. or WxWidgets 3.0 and using python 3.0 and Krusader, and I will call it "Aesthetic"(fires up his linux box after downing 3 energy drinks and starts to code)

Edited 2008-12-02 00:08 UTC

Reply Score: 6

RE: ok this just confuses me
by jacquouille on Tue 2nd Dec 2008 00:20 in reply to "ok this just confuses me"
jacquouille Member since:
2006-01-02

Well, for somebody versed in C++/Qt and wanting to work on a desktop environment, it's most attractive to just join the KDE project. Very active community, very liberal in granting commit rights (i.e. you quickly get global write access to the code). It's also very customizable/extensible. IMO that's why no other Qt project emerges.

Also, with a bit of tweaking (don't try mainstream distros out of the box...), even the latest KDE 4.2 runs smoothly on machines with 256 MB ram and a second-rate CPU. The more resource-hungry features (Strigi, Nepomuk, compositing) are easy to remove altogether at build-time. So most "netbook"-oriented distros can use it. Sure there's still a niche of distros for ultra-low-spec hardware, like 64 MB RAM, but frankly it's getting irrelevant, as machines with these amounts of RAM haven't been on the market for almost 10 years now.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE: ok this just confuses me
by evangs on Tue 2nd Dec 2008 16:33 in reply to "ok this just confuses me"
evangs Member since:
2005-07-07

... using python 3.0 ...


Lightweight?

Reply Parent Score: 2

poundsmack Member since:
2005-07-13

python would be a natural choice as it plays nicely with QT. also 3.0 is rather light qeight due to stripping out the legacy stuff from 1.x and 2.x releases. "the more you know"

Reply Parent Score: 2