Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 1st Dec 2008 23:31 UTC, submitted by linuxlinks
Window Managers "Mainstream Linux distributions typically default to one of two desktop environments, KDE or GNOME. Both of these environments provide users with an intuitive and attractive desktop, as well as offering a large raft of multimedia software, games, administration programs, network tools, educational applications, utilities, artwork, web development tools and more. However, these two desktops focus more on providing users with a modern computing environment with all the bells and whistles featured in Windows Vista, rather than minimising the amount of system resources they need. For users and developers who want to run an attractive Linux desktop on older hardware, netbooks, or mobile internet devices, neither KDE or GNOME may be a viable option, as they run too slowly on low spec machines (such as less than 256MB RAM and a 1 GHz processor). This article seeks to identify the best lean desktops for Linux, for users that have old or even ancient hardware."
Thread beginning with comment 338932
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: ok this just confuses me
by poundsmack on Tue 2nd Dec 2008 17:49 UTC in reply to "RE: ok this just confuses me"
Member since:

python would be a natural choice as it plays nicely with QT. also 3.0 is rather light qeight due to stripping out the legacy stuff from 1.x and 2.x releases. "the more you know"

Reply Parent Score: 2

evangs Member since:

By most objective measures, Python runs at least an order of magnitude slower than C/C++ code and consumes an average of 5x more memory.

I don't know how that qualifies as "lightweight".

Reply Parent Score: 2