Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Dec 2008 10:58 UTC
Windows Two weeks ago, I published an article in which I explained what was wrong about Randall Kennedy's "Windows 7 Unmasked" article. This was noted by Infoworld's editor-in-chief Eric Knorr, who suggested that Randall and I enter into an email debate regarding the various points made in our articles. We agreed upon publishing this email thread as-is, unedited (I didn't even fix the spelling errors), on both Infoworld and OSNews. We agreed that Randall would start the debate, and that I had the final word. Read on for the entertaining email debate (I figured it would be best to give each email its own page, for clarity's sake. My apologies if this makes each individual page much shorter than what you're used to from OSNews).
E-mail Print r 0   · Read More · 78 Comment(s)
Thread beginning with comment 338968
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
by Shkaba on Wed 3rd Dec 2008 00:27 UTC
Member since:

While I found comments regarding music to be ... uhmm ... tasteless, I thought that comments about "pink ponies and rainbows" was downright rude. Therefore on the ethics side of the debate Randall gets: -1 and Thom: -3.

On the matter of general logical principles, Randall gets: 1 and Thom gets: 3.

On the matter of properly evaluating an OS, Thom gets: 3 and Randall gets: 4

Overall this debate was in the lines of: I say "tomato" you say "tomaato"

Reply Score: 1