Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Dec 2008 23:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 339033
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Comment by flanque
by lemur2 on Wed 3rd Dec 2008 10:12
in reply to "RE[6]: Comment by flanque"
RE[8]: Comment by flanque
by flanque on Wed 3rd Dec 2008 10:49
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by flanque"
No, you've completely misunderstood what I said.
For the last time...
I asked why if they can put improvements into Windows 7 for performance then why not put them into Vista? You asked why buy Windows 7 then, to which I replied that other new features could justify it.
I don't see anything wrong or confusing about this.
Why don't you let people tell you what they meant rather than you try to tell them what they meant...
You're free to have the last say, as I am done with this stupid and pointless thread.





Member since:
2005-12-15
You don't get it. I was referring to Microsoft adding the performance enhancements to Vista that are in Windows 7 (since there seem to be some) and the incentive to buy Windows 7 would be other features which were missed out on in Vista.
So yeah, I did answer your question, thanks.