Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 5th Dec 2008 21:13 UTC, submitted by shaneco
Thread beginning with comment 339440
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That's funny as KDE is pretty much a Windows ripoff in terms of GUI.
Then again, in most people's eyes MS will always be the copycat even though it's the other way around.
KDE 4 looks a lot like Vista in certain aspects, hardly anyone notices. Screenshots of Windows 7 emerge and people call it a KDE4 ripoff because the new taskbar has bigger icons by default (even though you can set it to the same size icons for ages).
That's funny as KDE is pretty much a Windows ripoff in terms of GUI.
Then again, in most people's eyes MS will always be the copycat even though it's the other way around.
KDE 4 looks a lot like Vista in certain aspects, hardly anyone notices. Screenshots of Windows 7 emerge and people call it a KDE4 ripoff because the new taskbar has bigger icons by default (even though you can set it to the same size icons for ages).
Then again, in most people's eyes MS will always be the copycat even though it's the other way around.
KDE 4 looks a lot like Vista in certain aspects, hardly anyone notices. Screenshots of Windows 7 emerge and people call it a KDE4 ripoff because the new taskbar has bigger icons by default (even though you can set it to the same size icons for ages).
You realize that initially KDE was more of a CDE ripoff than a Windows one and that CDE has been around for ages before Windows 95 showed up, right? If anything, Windows 95 copied many things from other OSes and DEs, such as RISCOS, CDE and others.







Member since:
2005-12-28
Featurevise Redmond might have ripped off MacOS X - and it seems they've been planning some functionality but have been unable to replicate - like the heavy discussed database add-on to NTFS (WinFS, second edition).
But lookwise it rather look like a KDE2/3 rippoff.