Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 5th Dec 2008 21:13 UTC, submitted by shaneco
Is Windows 7 leaning too much towards the Mac side of life? Many Microsoft bloggers are saying that it does, that Windows 7 is too much "form over function", something they accuse Apple of. While superficially they may have a point, the differences between Windows and Mac OS X are still glaringly obvious. Are a few changes to the taskbar enough to make Windows OS X-like? Bloggers like Mary-Jo Foley, Paul Thurrot, and others seem to think so.
Thread beginning with comment 339463
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Getting expensive
by essdeekay on Sat 6th Dec 2008 22:42
in reply to "RE[4]: Getting expensive"
Member since:2006-01-31
You didn't consider the white-box PC builder. In 2002 he may have opted for the Windows XP Pro Full version for his new machine, $299.95. Six years later, he builds a new white box and decides to move to Windows Vista Premium Upgrade, add $129.95 to make a total of $429.90 for his Windows OS.
I never said anything about immediately upgrading.
In which case he got 6yrs use of XP so you can not include it's full original cost as it is marked down over time.
Otherwise, you could go further back and upgrade several versions of Windows to reach an even higher 'price' for Vista.
RE[6]: Getting expensive
by HagerR15 on Sun 7th Dec 2008 00:54
in reply to "RE[5]: Getting expensive"
Member since:2005-07-25
In which case he got 6yrs use of XP so you can not include it's full original cost as it is marked down over time.
Otherwise, you could go further back and upgrade several versions of Windows to reach an even higher 'price' for Vista.
Oh Good Lord, kid! You need to step back away from the computer and go get laid. This was meant as a hypothetical, worst case scenario.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-25
What flawed logic. If you need an upgrade version, you buy the discounted upgrade version. If you need the full version, you buy the full version. No-one in their right mind would pay for a full copy of XP only to immediately upgrade to Vista.
Vista is expensive as it is already, so why you feel the need to spend time conjuring up ways in which it becomes even more expensive I don't know.
You didn't consider the white-box PC builder. In 2002 he may have opted for the Windows XP Pro Full version for his new machine, $299.95. Six years later, he builds a new white box and decides to move to Windows Vista Premium Upgrade, add $129.95 to make a total of $429.90 for his Windows OS.
I never said anything about immediately upgrading.