Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Dec 2008 16:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 339672
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2005-07-06
If you believe that then you have taken leave of your senses, and it is totally at odds with the nature of the deal and relationship that exists.
Let's put it this way, there's more of a market to be had in selling your own stuff and making sure Linux installations (who you compete with) don't encroach on you selling your own stuff.
Meanwhile, on planet Earth, the successful companies who have their own stuff to sell (things like, oh, Windows Server) look after those interests first and make sure that competitors (oh, things like Linux distributors) don't encroach on their ability to sell their own stuff and make money.
Selling and providing support for your competitors dilutes your business in a rather stupid way, and the proof is in Novell's overall financial results where they have had to stretch out their Linux business in an esoteric way to mask the truth.
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. When you're painted into a corner and you're shown to be just a bit daft, paint the opposing position as a conspiracy theory by mentioning black helicopters. We get it.
It's a wild and fantastical conspiracy theory that it is not normal business practice to do deals with your competitors to try and stop them from competing with you because they're eating all your lunch. I know. It's so far-fetched.
Oh, there's plenty of iron left, which is equal to Novell's stupidity, and there's no harming in pointing it out. That's why people make comments ;-).