Linked by weildish on Fri 12th Dec 2008 01:01 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 340114
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
First impression: Cool!
First impression: I remember some german software company introducing something like the paperless office (which is an utipoium since the 60s) in approx 1990, with "Leitz-Ordner" on a shelf, folders and papers. I thought: "Hey, this seems to be something similar." This software didn't only try to bring the "desktop metaphor" into a computer GUI, no, it replicated more elements of an office (professional use) such as filing cabinets, faxing machines and such stuff we know from an office.
Potential for a really handy tool for those who are familiar with concepts of how to organize things on a real desk. For those who aren't, well... :-)
I had a colleague who was very messy. Half of his cubicle was a pile of junk that reached to the top of the cubicle. Whenever he wanted something, he would rummage through all the stuff, throwing things aside until he found it. One day I asked him to find a computer file for me that I'd erased by mistake. It was taking him a while, so I went to look over his shoulder. His desktop was an exact duplicate of his cubicle. It had a massive pile of icons in one corner, and he was furiously rummaging through them to uncover the right file.
Source: http://www.rinkworks.com/stupid/cs_icons.shtml
After some thought: How is an application represented in this environment? A browser? pdf-viewer?
I think the "desktop metaphor" would apply here, and it would require a document-centric approach, so there are no applications for theirselves - they're referenced by the document type or content; opening a document means to run a specific program and load the file into it for further use. This approach would be a good means to hide the "technical stuff" like applications from the user who does not work with applications anyway, but with documents.
Another approach would be to organize applications like the usual office tools on a shelf or in a drawer, such as staplers, tape, glue or a ruler.
What happens if you would brows a (traditional)system-direcotry with 1k+ files? How would things like that be managed?
Surprisingly, I assume. :-)
For browsing around my ~ , maybe it would be at least cool, but regarding the questions above, maybe even useful?
I can just speak from my very individual point of view: Cool - yes. Useful - I doubt... But I'm sure, as I mentioned before, that there's real potential for some fields of use, even if it's just a training setting for people with disorders who can't keep their stuff tidy and ordered. :-)






Member since:
2006-12-18
First impression: Cool!
After some thought: How is an application represented in this environment? A browser? pdf-viewer? What happens if you would brows a (traditional)system-direcotry with 1k+ files? How would things like that be managed?
They dont think I would have my /home, /lib /etc /proc or even / in a pile each?
For browsing around my ~ , maybe it would be at least cool, but regarding the questions above, maybe even useful?
Edited 2008-12-12 11:17 UTC