Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 15th Dec 2008 15:10 UTC
Editorial InternetNews.com states: "Microsoft (or a really smart ISV) should build a full application manager for Windows, similar to what most Linux distributions do today." Most Windows applications come with their own distinctive updating mechanism (much like Mac OS X), instead of having a centralised updating location like most Linux distributions offer. While it certainly wouldn't be harmful for Windows to gain such a feature - the question remains: isn't it time we rethink program installation and management altogether?
Thread beginning with comment 340378
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: KISS
by Thom_Holwerda on Mon 15th Dec 2008 20:27 UTC in reply to "KISS"
Thom_Holwerda
Member since:
2005-06-29

I'm personally a fan of the "Keep It Simple, Stupid" approach to software installation and management. Just give me an archive to download and an OS that makes it simple to install applications via drag-n-drop.


The proposal I made (linked in the short article) is sounds exactly like what you'd want. Coincidentally, the proposals for the Haiku system implement many parts of my proposal.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: KISS
by StephenBeDoper on Mon 15th Dec 2008 21:03 in reply to "RE: KISS"
StephenBeDoper Member since:
2005-07-06

The proposal I made (linked in the short article) is sounds exactly like what you'd want. Coincidentally, the proposals for the Haiku system implement many parts of my proposal.


Ha, I never made the connection before - but now that you mention it, the "filer chute" idea *does* sound quite similar to the concept you described.

Reply Parent Score: 2