Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 15th Dec 2008 15:10 UTC
Editorial states: "Microsoft (or a really smart ISV) should build a full application manager for Windows, similar to what most Linux distributions do today." Most Windows applications come with their own distinctive updating mechanism (much like Mac OS X), instead of having a centralised updating location like most Linux distributions offer. While it certainly wouldn't be harmful for Windows to gain such a feature - the question remains: isn't it time we rethink program installation and management altogether?
Thread beginning with comment 340403
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

All of them , why because there based on BSD usual lies. GNU/Linux is a mainstream OS sold at Dell , Walmart and best buy and many other's , BSD is not.

No it means the result are not to be used to discuss BSD population or ranking.

Usual manufacturing discussion involving new parts. That's why OEM use the same internal and bases.

You also missed the customers vs user's point.

OS X is BSD based and has ADOBE support , even do they share the smae code base one as user's the other as paying customers.

GNU/linux also as customers and why we are starting to get there technologies :

Reply Parent Score: -1