Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Tue 16th Dec 2008 07:02 UTC, submitted by stonyandcher
Apple Microsoft's first-ever iPhone application is a slick photo viewer with a browsing capability that handles a large number of photos on a mobile device screen. The Seadragon mobile application is free through Apple's application store. It a product of Microsoft's Live Labs division, which focuses on developing Web-based technology and applications. Seadragon incorporates the Deep Zoom feature, which is also integrated into Silverlight 2, Microsoft's multimedia tool. It allows a user to quickly magnify a particular area of a photo, regardless of its size.
Thread beginning with comment 340510
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: And Apple Allowed it!?!?
by dragossh on Tue 16th Dec 2008 19:14 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: And Apple Allowed it!?!?"
dragossh
Member since:
2008-12-16

It shows that they are not the one who are responsible for the port. Meaningless for you , surely , but not for me and others. it also show that Apple is not really sharing it's own software but improving those made by others , unless they are forced to do so. If they did port there entire catalog and allowed other to work on it , nobody would have anything to say about that point. You also tried to use the minority to show as a majority and made a false point.

Apple forked KHTML for their Safari browser so WebKit was born. They are responsible for the port, they are sharing the code, and they own WebKit. Even OS X's core is open source, you can go and build your own Darwin distribution if you want.

And Apple doesn't owe other platform users anything. Just like Microsoft has the right to keep their software on their own OS (e.g. Media Player, Media Center, Windows Live Essentials), so does Apple.
Of course they will port their software if that gets them money. They are a company, not a charity and they follow their own interests.

That's where your the most wrong. Apple Branding is not equal to full ownership.

He's not:
Apple purchased NeXT => NeXTStep is owned by Apple => OS X is born, and surprise, it's Apple's property
Apple purchased touch company => IP owned by Apple
Apple purchased CUPS => CUPS is owned by Apple. License doesn't matter.
[and so on...]

Edited 2008-12-16 19:16 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3

Moulinneuf Member since:
2005-07-06

You missed reality :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit

License doesn't matter.


That's not what Apple is saying to Psystar ...

Reply Parent Score: -1

dragossh Member since:
2008-12-16


Next time you give a link, please read it:
WebKit was originally derived by Apple Inc. from the Konqueror browser’s KHTML software library for use as the engine of Mac OS X’s Safari web browser

And that's exactly what I said. Apple forked KHTML and made WebKit. Even though it was later adopted by other companies, this still doesn't change the fact that WebKit was made by Apple.

"License doesn't matter.


That's not what Apple is saying to Psystar ...
"
Stop misquoting me. I said "Apple purchased CUPS => CUPS is owned by Apple. License doesn't matter." It's not the same thing.

You either hate Apple with a passion, just like to troll or your knowledge is flawed. I think it's a combination of the first two.

Reply Parent Score: 3