Linked by Rahul on Mon 22nd Dec 2008 09:13 UTC
Right after the recent news that Red Hat is offering a new subscription for mission critical deployment that extends the life-cycle for up to 10 years, Red Hat has announced another, that allows the customers to stay in a single point release for up to eighteen months and continue to get updates and support that point release. Matt Asay writes: "Red Hat has set the standard for world class software support, consistently earning top marks with CIOs for its efforts. On Thursday, however, Red Hat outdid itself, introducing a new product support plan called Extended Update Support. In a nutshell, Extended Update Support enables customers to run their mission-critical systems for longer stretches of time without having to take production systems offline to update them."
Thread beginning with comment 341109
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2005-07-06
If there is a truly a demand for such a option, probably something based off Fedora might be a better deal. There should a community of contributors willing to extend the updates beyond what is offered. There are some but not enough critical mass I suspect. Fedora Legacy died a slow death but maybe things are different now. I suspect, people who want it are only in wishlist mode rather than in participatory mode at the moment. Would be interesting to see if that changes. I might even join the effort.
Member since:2005-07-24
If there is a truly a demand for such a option, probably something based off Fedora might be a better deal.
I doubt it's in the cards.
There should a community of contributors willing to extend the updates beyond what is offered. There are some but not enough critical mass I suspect. Fedora Legacy died a slow death
Fedora Legacy died a quick death. It just took a while to get through the denial phase. At this point, if a group of people did get together, without official Red Hat support, claiming to be committed to extending Fedora support, no one would believe them, anyway. Besides that, our Christmas wish list includes stable (not bleeding edge) releases and not just longer support.
Ubuntu LTS has been on my radar. But the Red Hat family of OSes gets so much *right* for multiuser boxes that I hesitate in actually moving my XDMCP servers to it.
I've learned to live with the fact that there isn't a Santa Clause. ;-)
Edited 2008-12-22 22:20 UTC
Member since:
2005-07-24
Yes. Red Hat has their work cut out for them, meeting all these commitments. And the Red Hat team does take its promises seriously. Not making commitments that they can't keep is laudable. The 18 to 24 month thing has been implied since about 2.1, I think. But if that is changing, we can live with it. I neglected to mention that we use CentOS. So I try to be careful about criticizing the upstream, which does a damn fine job, even if I really *would* like a middle of the road distro with a 12 month release cycle and 18-24 months of support. (Hey, it's Christmas!)
-Steve
Edited 2008-12-22 21:57 UTC