Linked by Amjith Ramanujam on Tue 23rd Dec 2008 00:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 341183
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
No, openSuSe has as big repositories. Nevertheless the official openSuSE points out that the only endorsed way upgrading the distro is by starting the installer DVD but I made a pure "zypper dup" (before I updated the repository baseurls to 11.1 and I then upgraded "zypper in zypper"). And I had no problem!
But coming from debian-sidux it seems to me that the apt packaging system has more expressiveness than any rpm system (think of all the meta and transitional debian packages!). The openSUSE wiki has a special page describing the difficulties of splitting or merging packages therefore. Ever wonder why they do not just change to apt packages then ? I know there was thus an attempt going on some years ago...






Member since:
2005-07-13
*heavy sigh*
I upgraded openSUSE 11.0 to 11.1 by changing my repos to point at 11.1, and then running Yast to upgrade all packages.
RPM-based distros will break on distro upgrades for exactly the same reason that Debian-based ones will: when you're using non-standard or third-party repos that aren't in synch.
The openSUSE build service, which houses a multitude of contributory repos, automatically builds packages against multiple versions (and distros) and updates packages when applicable dependencies change in those targets. The popular third party repos follow factory development and generally have repos available for the new version at release. This means that as long as you point to the new sources properly, then there should be little issue with updating.
As an example, I had unsupported KDE 4.2 packages from the build-service installed in 11.0. Upon upgrading, it updated the the appropriate unsupported KDE 4.2 packages for 11.1 along with the core 11.1 upgrade.
Dependency-hell disappeared a decade ago. If it still occurs, it's an issue with the packager, not the package management.