To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
you're grouping the kui viewer plasmoid with the notification plasmoids though they both look the same.
True that they are more interactive, but to me it seems silly to have a message come up and not (at least be possible) to interact with it, Really does one really agonize over the decision of whether or not to press the button?
But this is about the underlying gallago spec which kde has already implemented plus some modifications.
These notifications are merely a matter of preference.
If canonical wanted to do something really useful, they would commit to help clean up the system tray to be the way it is meant to be...persistent notifications and no other junk (idiocy of minimising programs to the system tray)
Edited 2008-12-24 01:18 UTC
I'm grouping what's now grouped by the KDE project. The progress "window" of a download is now the same thing as a "New mail" notification.
Obviously the Canonical guys have a different take than you.
Maybe you are talking about Galago, but Shuttleworth is not. His blog posting focuses on the usability side of things.







Member since:
2005-07-06
Oh c'mon! As someone who actually knows Growl as well as KDE 4.2beta I can tell you that there are some huge differences. For starters: KDE's is much more interactive. There are Stop and Pause buttons for longer operations like downloads, there are View and Ignore buttons for incoming chat messages, and so on.
Canonical's Growl imitation will have -- at least that seems to be the plan -- no interaction at all.