Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Dec 2008 20:49 UTC, submitted by judgen
The legal back-and-forth between PsyStar and Apple is slowly but surely moving into the twilight zone. Not too long ago we had Apple going all black helicopter on PsyStar claiming people and/or companies other than PsyStar are involved in the clone maker's unlawful practices, even though Apple could so far not name any of them because, well, they don't know who they are yet. If that wasn't enough, PsyStar now claims that Apple's copyright on Mac OS X is invalid.
Thread beginning with comment 341434
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Software Copyright and Appple
by sagum on Thu 25th Dec 2008 05:43
in reply to "Software Copyright and Appple"
Member since:2006-01-23
The software copyright should only limit you on how many computers you can use the software *but* it *absolutely* should *not* limit you on the type of hardware you will be using it.
I don't think a copyright can limit the amount of computers you can use the software with. A copyright is just a legal writ to say who has ownership to copy.
Any software you use is bound by the terms you agree to use it by, the EULA (end user legal agreement) and that stipulates that you can instal it on 1, 2 or however many machines. it may even refer you to other legal agreements such as site or seat licensing agreements.
Generally the only thing a legal copyright owner can tell you to do with software you've brought is to not to make a backup of it for anyone other then yourself.
Remember, when you 'buy' software, you're usually buying the 'right of use' for it on the terms set out in the EULA.
RE[2]: Software Copyright and Appple
by OSGuy on Thu 25th Dec 2008 07:11
in reply to "RE: Software Copyright and Appple"
Member since:2006-01-01
RE: Software Copyright and Appple
by Bobthearch on Thu 25th Dec 2008 07:30
in reply to "Software Copyright and Appple"
Member since:2006-01-27
Imagine if HP grabbed a bunch of Windows copies and put them on PCs without consulting with MS.
HP or any other computer manufacturer absolutely CAN do that, and many smaller companies and independent builders do it every day! Heck, I've done it several times myself with absolutely no 'consultation', permission, or communication with Microsoft.
In the case of HP though, they get a huge price break in exchange for signing marketing agreements with Microsoft.
Psystar isn't asking for any such special agreements with Apple, but merely trying to protect their legal right to pre-install lawfully-purchased software on their computers.
But the peripheral suits and counter-suits are getting ridiculous and aren't relavent to the basic disagreement. Another SCO-like circus...
Edited 2008-12-25 07:30 UTC
RE: Software Copyright and Appple
by Gone fishing on Fri 26th Dec 2008 06:45
in reply to "Software Copyright and Appple"
Member since:2006-02-22
I can't see why it would be the end of Apple. If OEMs had the choice of Vista or OSX - well I know which I'd choose. Apple might change from a hardware to a software company, but with innovative design etc even thats not inevitable.
Whether this would be a good thing - Apple with an OS monopoly - scary.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
"This is my NeXTstation Turbo Color booting the Mac System 7.1 Operating System using a hardware add-on called 'Daydream'. The Daydream has a Mac ROM and a few custom ICs in it and hooked up to the NeXTs DSP port. Turns your NeXT into a full fledged 68k powered Mac." So cool.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
"The NetBSD Project is pleased to announce NetBSD 6.1, the first feature update of the NetBSD 6 release branch. It represents a selected subset of fixes deemed important for security or stability reasons, as well as new features and enhancements. Please note that all fixes in the prior security/bugfix updates (NetBSD 6.0.1 and 6.0.2) are also in 6.1."
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
"At the end of a week in which Electronic Arts confirmed it wasn't developing a thing for the Wii U, one of the software engineers in EA Sports' Canada studio, in a series of since-deleted tweets, disparaged the console as 'crap' and suggested Nintendo should give up on hardware altogether. 'The Wii U is crap. Less powerful than an Xbox 360. Poor online/store. Weird tablet', tweeted Bob Summerwill, listed as a senior software engineer at EA Canada, in a reply to a tweet posting a link about EA's no-Wii U news. 'Nintendo are walking dead at this point'." The Wii U is turning into the 21st century's Virtual Boy.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
"In NixOS, the entire operating system - the kernel, applications, system packages, configuration files, and so on - is built by the Nix package manager from a description in a purely functional build language. The fact that it's purely functional essentially means that building a new configuration cannot overwrite previous configurations. Most of the other features follow from this." Interesting approach. A Linux distribution, sure, but with some very refreshing ideas about system configuration.
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Appfour added, among other features, C/C++ support to its new version of AIDE. From Android-IDE, "Now you can write parts of your app or your whole app in C/C++ on your device. AIDE supports the Standard Android NDK toolchain (GCC 4.6 + Bionic, STL, ...). No changes are necessary if you want to build an app developed on a PC with Eclipse. C/C++ development is fully integrated: Build errors appear in the error list and files can easily be navigated to with Go to file. The editor supports C/C++ syntax highlighting."
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Ars nails it: "The answer is that Google did announce what amounts to a fairly substantial Android update yesterday. They simply did it without adding to the update fragmentation problems that continue to plague the platform. By focusing on these changes and not the apparently-waiting-in-the-wings update to the core software, Google is showing us one of the ways in which it's trying to fix the update problem."
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
"It is good for programmers to understand what goes on inside a processor. The CPU is at the heart of our career. What goes on inside the CPU? How long does it take for one instruction to run? What does it mean when a new CPU has a 12-stage pipeline, or 18-stage pipeline, or even a 'deep' 31-stage pipeline? Programs generally treat the CPU as a black box. Instructions go into the box in order, instructions come out of the box in order, and some processing magic happens inside. As a programmer, it is useful to learn what happens inside the box. This is especially true if you will be working on tasks like program optimization. If you don't know what is going on inside the CPU, how can you optimize for it? This article is about what goes on inside the x86 processor's deep pipeline."
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
"It was the only moment I heard regret slip into Otellini's voice during the several hours of conversations I had with him. 'The lesson I took away from that was, while we like to speak with data around here, so many times in my career I've ended up making decisions with my gut, and I should have followed my gut,' he said. 'My gut told me to say yes.'" The world would've been a much different place - Apple would have been less dependant on Samsung for its chips, which probably would've meant less money for Samsung to develop its Galaxy business.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Glass is getting some love at Google I/O as well. New applications have been released - Facebook, Twitter, Evernote, Elle, Tumblr, and CNN. Perhaps more interesting: the newly announced Google Glass Developer Kit will allow offline applications and direct hardware access - great for hacking and expanding Glass' potential. This kit will really allow hackers to put Glass through its paces.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
"But Beck and Merrill decided that simply banning toxic players wasn't an acceptable solution for their game. Riot Games began experimenting with more constructive modes of player management through a formal player behavior initiative that actually conducts controlled experiments on its player base to see what helps reduce bad behavior. The results of that initiative have been shared at a lecture at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and on panels at the Penny Arcade Expo East and the Game Developers Conference." Absolutely fascinating stuff. I'm a League of Legends player, and to be honest, the community isn't nearly as bad as some make it out to be. I'm happy Riot games has the guts to employ science to address the issue.More News »
Sponsored Links
Member since:
2006-01-01
The software copyright should only limit you on how many computers you can use the software *but* it *absolutely* should *not* limit you on the type of hardware you will be using it. That is your own right. You purchase a license and you are obliged to comply that you will not make illegal copies but when it comes to usage, I should be allowed to pick the hardware *I* want. Software and hardware are independent.
However, I am afraid if PsyStar does win, Apple's days will be numbered. Soon everyone will start doing what PsyStar does and things will get out of control since the copyright will be invalid. Imagine if HP grabbed a bunch of Windows copies and put them on PCs without consulting with MS. So a company can do this and not care what Apple says. Apple will be powerless to stop them. They will struggle.
Apple is a hardware company. Although I dislike Apple and their business practises, I believe it would be very bad if they do lose as they are proven innovators and the only way to survive would be to continue to do what they do. For the sake of Apple and the rest of the IT world, I want them to win. I don't like what they do BUT it would be better if they win. Only time will tell what they will come up with in the future -- Personal Opinion --
Edited 2008-12-25 03:08 UTC