Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Dec 2008 20:49 UTC, submitted by judgen
Legal The legal back-and-forth between PsyStar and Apple is slowly but surely moving into the twilight zone. Not too long ago we had Apple going all black helicopter on PsyStar claiming people and/or companies other than PsyStar are involved in the clone maker's unlawful practices, even though Apple could so far not name any of them because, well, they don't know who they are yet. If that wasn't enough, PsyStar now claims that Apple's copyright on Mac OS X is invalid.
Thread beginning with comment 341444
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Software Copyright and Appple
by Bobthearch on Thu 25th Dec 2008 07:30 UTC in reply to "Software Copyright and Appple"
Bobthearch
Member since:
2006-01-27

Imagine if HP grabbed a bunch of Windows copies and put them on PCs without consulting with MS.

HP or any other computer manufacturer absolutely CAN do that, and many smaller companies and independent builders do it every day! Heck, I've done it several times myself with absolutely no 'consultation', permission, or communication with Microsoft.

In the case of HP though, they get a huge price break in exchange for signing marketing agreements with Microsoft.

Psystar isn't asking for any such special agreements with Apple, but merely trying to protect their legal right to pre-install lawfully-purchased software on their computers.

But the peripheral suits and counter-suits are getting ridiculous and aren't relavent to the basic disagreement. Another SCO-like circus...

Edited 2008-12-25 07:30 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4