Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Dec 2008 20:49 UTC, submitted by judgen
Legal The legal back-and-forth between PsyStar and Apple is slowly but surely moving into the twilight zone. Not too long ago we had Apple going all black helicopter on PsyStar claiming people and/or companies other than PsyStar are involved in the clone maker's unlawful practices, even though Apple could so far not name any of them because, well, they don't know who they are yet. If that wasn't enough, PsyStar now claims that Apple's copyright on Mac OS X is invalid.
Thread beginning with comment 341449
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Comment by Pandronic
by pandronic on Thu 25th Dec 2008 08:39 UTC
pandronic
Member since:
2006-05-18

As I understand this case ... it's not a problem that Pystar makes hardware that is compatible with Mac OS X, it's not a problem if Pystar resells Mac OS X, it might be a breach of EULA if Pystar installs it on the OpenComputer and it might be a copyright infringement if they redistribute Apple's patches and updates.

Obviously the part about the copyright infringement is the worse.

So, what I don't understand is why they don't make their own update program that pulls only safe patches directly from Apple's servers without them passing through Pystar's servers. Wouldn't this pretty much solve the copyright issue? Is it doable?

Reply Score: 2