Linked by Kroc Camen on Thu 25th Dec 2008 07:50 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Thread beginning with comment 341500
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: the list is impressive
by sbergman27 on Thu 25th Dec 2008 22:24
in reply to "RE[4]: the list is impressive"
Your second point doesn't actually make any sense at all, and it doesn't help you to bash NT or Windows, which is exactly what you did in your first message just for the sake of it. Sorry.
Well, I'm a Linux guy. But I don't really see where this particular type of Linux kernel vs NT kernel stuff gets us. So let me throw this into the ring to see if maybe something constructive comes of it: MinWin is/was/will be about emulating some strengths of the Linux kernel philosophy.
Edited 2008-12-25 22:25 UTC





Member since:
2005-07-06
No, it's because it's open source, cheap, and so can be customized by third parties.
Your second point doesn't actually make any sense at all, and it doesn't help you to bash NT or Windows, which is exactly what you did in your first message just for the sake of it. Sorry.
Edited 2008-12-25 21:58 UTC