Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Dec 2008 20:49 UTC, submitted by judgen
Thread beginning with comment 341569
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-06
The reason that Apple is using Intel hardware is twfold: (1) most shops are already running Intel hardware, more parts are available, and it provides ensured compatibility, and (2) the Intel ecosystem is advancing faster than competing architectures and Apple can leverage those advances at the same rate (or faster) than competitors (Dell, Microsoft, HP, etc).
While OS X is like using Linux with Gnome or KDE, OS 9 and earlier versions were decidedly unfriendly to noobs and the cybernetically inept - who make up most of the home user market.
The UI isn't the reason that Apple has a smaller market share. It's price and compatibility. At one time, Apple's UI was, in fact, much more innovative than anything offered by Microsoft. While some would argue that the Apple UI stagnated up to OS9, they've done a great job revamping the UI for OS X.