To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
My desktop is from 2002/2003 (P42.8Ghz-HT, 2GB, GeForce 6200 128MB) and Vista flies, without any tweaking, full Aero, all bells and whistles.
My laptop, an Aspire One netbook, has 1.5GB RAM, Atom 1.6Ghz, integrated Intel video, and Vista flies, without any tweaking, full Aero, all bells and whistles.
I don't know what everyone else is doing wrong, or what I did right.
...
I don't know what everyone else is doing wrong, or what I did right.
You bought a MB capable of accepting 2GB of RAM and maxed it out, carefully selecting DIMMs that would allow you to achieve the full, and impressive, 2GB on that MB in 2002/2003. Don't be so humble. Stand up and take the credit.
Edited 2008-12-27 00:37 UTC
"I don't know what everyone else is doing wrong, or what I did right."
Exactly what I keep wondering. I have friends and family that currently swear by Vista, and have had no issues. Granted my desktop system is pentium D 840 EE, 4GB RAM, and a 256 MB GeForce 6800 GT. I will grant this machine was top of the line when I bought it, but then as I said, I buy my machines to last 3-4 years, so take advances in technology/software into consideration so it lasts.





Member since:
2005-12-02
"Hardware bought two years ago is still good hardware, but not good enough for Vista."
Vista runs fine on my hardware that was purchased in June of 2005. That is over 3 years old. The hardware is still good enough to run any modern OS, and that includes Vista. I buy a new machine every 3-4 years, and make sure that it will last for at least that long.