Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 24th Dec 2008 20:49 UTC, submitted by judgen
Legal The legal back-and-forth between PsyStar and Apple is slowly but surely moving into the twilight zone. Not too long ago we had Apple going all black helicopter on PsyStar claiming people and/or companies other than PsyStar are involved in the clone maker's unlawful practices, even though Apple could so far not name any of them because, well, they don't know who they are yet. If that wasn't enough, PsyStar now claims that Apple's copyright on Mac OS X is invalid.
Thread beginning with comment 341591
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
sbergman27
Member since:
2005-07-24

My desktop is from 2002/2003 (P42.8Ghz-HT, 2GB, GeForce 6200 128MB)
...
I don't know what everyone else is doing wrong, or what I did right.

You bought a MB capable of accepting 2GB of RAM and maxed it out, carefully selecting DIMMs that would allow you to achieve the full, and impressive, 2GB on that MB in 2002/2003. Don't be so humble. Stand up and take the credit.

Edited 2008-12-27 00:37 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

You bought a MB capable of accepting 2GB of RAM and maxed it out, carefully selecting DIMMs that would allow you to achieve the full, and impressive, 2GB on that MB in 2002/2003. Don't be so humble. Stand up and take the credit.


I maxed out the RAM only a few months go. Before that, it had 512MB and ran Windows 2000.

Reply Parent Score: 1