To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That's because you don't know Dave Thomas, don't know his reputation, haven't read his books and haven't seen presentations and been to conferences where you have discussed what you've just seen with others.
You can try reading the interesting parts of Zed Shaw's analysis of the whole thing as I had said before. You only need to read this chapter as well:
http://www.rubycentral.com/pickaxe/tut_classes.html
It is exceptionally poor object orientation, is a very ill fitting scenario and doesn't even use standard and accepted Ruby syntax that you see elsewhere. Then there's this:
http://www.rubycentral.com/pickaxe/classes.html
Nuff said.
You would know exactly what that uncryptic statement means if you knew what you were talking about and could actually defend Dave Thomas. Life is too short to explain here if you don't know.





Member since:
2006-05-09
This guy is the bane of RoR...