Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 30th Dec 2008 23:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 341966
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Apple Can't Survive Without Steve
by MysterMask on Wed 31st Dec 2008 09:29
in reply to "RE[3]: Apple Can't Survive Without Steve"
The designs are very heavily influenced by electrical products made in Germany by Braun in the 1960s.
*Pff*
You wouldn't call the Mona Lisa a simple copycat product just because the way portraits were made at that time was heavily influenced by earlier painters.
Just because the original iPod resembles a Braun product, I wouldn't call Apple's design not "original". Since design means more than just the form.
a plan or drawing produced to show the look and function or workings of a building, garment, or other object before it is built or made
Resembling something doesn't mean it is a simple copy. You will always find something that was build earlier and resembles some actual product. E. g. the iPhone resembles a smartphone. But an important part of the iPhone's design is the reduction to pure touch input. Where were the sources for a pure touch based phone? Which other phone vendors did it before? Such radical decisions to simplify things is what makes Apples design IMHO unique.
RE[5]: Apple Can't Survive Without Steve
by unclefester on Wed 31st Dec 2008 10:18
in reply to "RE[4]: Apple Can't Survive Without Steve"







Member since:
2007-01-13
There is absolutely nothing original about the design of most Apple products. The designs are very heavily influenced by electrical products made in Germany by Braun in the 1960s.