Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th Jan 2009 18:51 UTC, submitted by drcoldfoot
Thread beginning with comment 342382
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
to many people steve jobs = apple
his ill health hit the stock
http://finance.google.co.uk/finance?chdnp=1&chdd=1&chds=1&chdv=1&ch...
he had to make it clear he was doing well and in charge






Member since:
2005-12-15
Agreed, though I suspect a great deal of 'community speculation' would have added to the decision.
In the end, as long as he is in good health that is all that matters. The fact that he remains CEO of Apple during his recovery is a brave, but unncessary move.
I couldn't imagine any decent person who'd want to put his role at Apple above his health.