Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th Jan 2009 18:51 UTC, submitted by drcoldfoot
Thread beginning with comment 342391
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-08-07
Seriously, given Jobs' obligations to Apple as CEO what else could they do but dispell the "rumors" and downplay them, regardless of whether they were true or false?
We've already seen the consequence to Apple's stock when the a fraudulent announcement of his death was reported on a major tech's blogging site, we already know what kind of impact allegations of Jobs' health provoke.
If Jobs didn't dispute these "rumors" now he'd be sued by all kinds of Apple stockholders!!!
--bornagainpenguin