Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th Jan 2009 18:34 UTC, submitted by alcibiades
Thread beginning with comment 342439
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Its an excellent review, questions though
by zdzichu on Tue 6th Jan 2009 10:32
in reply to "Its an excellent review, questions though"
RE[2]: Its an excellent review, questions though
by DittoBox on Tue 6th Jan 2009 19:05
in reply to "RE: Its an excellent review, questions though"
The main point of this device is arguably the ability to install Mac OS X without using sharpened knitting needles and some kind of Voodoo doppleganger of your computer. To that end most reviews won't feature obscure features like Linux EFI compatibility. (Less than 10% of PC users install OS X, few of those will use EFI-X, and even fewer of those will install Linux using EFI-X)
That said it would be nice to know how well it works with Linux, what distros or more specifically what kernel configurations are required.





Member since:
2005-10-12
Its an excellent review, detailed and specific and balanced. The account of the legal issues is also very good. And finally, the comments are unusually intelligent and thought provoking and balanced. The whole thing is worth a careful read.
The thing you're left wondering is whether the device itself is really necessary. It seems just to do an initial boot using EFI, and then allow the user to pick a boot device.
So, would the BOOT-KABYL-BUMBY.iso do this equally well? I don't feel interested enough to assemble the required hardware and a retail copy of OSX to try, be interesting to hear from anyone who has. That said, if you were going to buy a new machine anyway, the spec required is pretty reasonable, so it would not be a bad choice.
Their pricing comparison basically shows you get a more fit for purpose machine than the Pro, with better quality components, for around half the price. Its the kind of tradeoff any Mac buyer in an open market would make - 95% would benefit from lowering the processor spec and investing more in graphics and hard drives, and still saving money. They used the Antec 180 in the tested machine - so even the case is way better than Apple's.