Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 6th Jan 2009 20:57 UTC, submitted by jptros
Thread beginning with comment 342629
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-06
The "read more" section of the article isn't entirely clear on the relationship between the original releases of OS X Server and the current Apple OSes that bear the "OS X" name (effectively, there were two separate-but-related lines of OS X that have been called "OS X Server" - the 1.x line and the 10.x line).
IIRC, OS X Server (the 1.x versions) were effectively updated versions of Rhapsody - using a modified version of the OS 8/9 "platinum" theme, with NeXTStep tech under the hood. It was released a year or two before the original OS X public beta - and OS X Server (or its codebase) was the basis for client versions of OS X.
And after the release of 10.0, Apple released a version with some server-specific tools under the "OS X Server" label. So in a nutshell, OS X Server 10.x is based on client versions of OS X 10.x, which is in turn based on OS X Server 1.x.
BTW, for anyone else interested in the history of OS X, ArsTechnica published very thorough articles on each of the "Developer Preview" releases (from DP2 onward):
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/os/macos-x-dp2.ars
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/1q00/macos-x-gui/macos-x-gui-1.html
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/1q00/macos-x-dp3/macos-x-dp3-1.html
http://arstechnica.com/reviews/2q00/macos-x-dp4/macos-x-dp4-1.html