Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 11th Jan 2009 23:31 UTC
Windows People who work for for-profit companies, especially large ones, are always a bit uninteresting to interview, with media training and marketing instructions taking out all the sharp edges. CNet interviewed Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, and they got some very interesting quotes from the love-him-or-hate-him CEO.
Thread beginning with comment 343112
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by moleskine
by unclefester on Mon 12th Jan 2009 05:51 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by moleskine"
unclefester
Member since:
2007-01-13

Personally I think any power consumption over 50W is excessive. Video cards in particular are shockers.

Why can't we buy a powerful 2D multimedia video card that only uses 20 watts for under $100? Most people aren't gamers but many of us want smooth blu-ray playback and fast video encoding without needing a quad core $500 CPU.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Comment by moleskine
by UltraZelda64 on Mon 12th Jan 2009 06:26 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by moleskine"
UltraZelda64 Member since:
2006-12-05

Good point on the power hog modern GPUs. Those things are ridiculous. Okay, I admit, although I'm not a gamer I do like to have high-performance stuff. That includes a high-quality GPU.

But come on; they went from weak but efficient, to more powerful and requiring a bit more power, to even more power and requiring their own fan(s), to even MORE power and requiring their own power supply cable, to the (IMO) completely unnecessary "SLI" (two power-hungry video cards with unnecessarily high power). Who knows what additional power/temperature requirements are on today's cards.

I'd just like to *have* that extra horsepower when I want it (which is rarely). But most of the time I just want it to run nice and cool and not waste power doing basically nothing (ie., displaying the same static image or watching a video). I don't like integrated-anything (included graphics), so that's completely out of the picture for me. Other than GPUs, I can't think of a single other piece of hardware that I absolutely despise for their inefficiency.

Even the processor (as innefficient as the x86 is) at least has been gaining efficiency modes.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Comment by moleskine
by Bernhard on Mon 12th Jan 2009 11:40 in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by moleskine"
Bernhard Member since:
2008-11-12

Personally I think any power consumption over 50W is excessive. Video cards in particular are shockers.
Why can't we buy a powerful 2D multimedia video card that only uses 20 watts for under $100?


A Radeon 4350 does HD playback and has a price tag of 30€ (Germany). Okay, it needs 25 Watts but it's pretty close to what you want.

Back to topic:
Vista may run ok on new Hardware, but it broke compatibility with a lot of old apps AND with a lot of old Hardware. Both of which is bad for the corporate guys. They wouldn't throw out perfectly good stuff just because an OS update requires it!

OTOH, Vista didn't break compatibility enough to finally get rid of all those old design flaws. Most of which date back to NT, 95 or even Mess-Dos...

Reply Parent Score: 2