To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Ive met steve ballmer aswell when he was in london a few weeks back. I think he is a terrible public figure for microsoft. He makes incredibly rash and stupid comments which lets down the intelligent people at microsoft. At least with bill gates he had some carisma which a lot of people could either like or dislike.
He is completely unprofessional and i find him really boring to listen to also, i switch off a lot of his presentations.
I personally think they should move some of the newer talent to the spot light a lot more. I find Steve Sinosky a much more likeable, intelligent speak that Ballmer. I think they should retire him to a seat upstairs, he may keep his CEO title but please other someone who is likeable giving important presentations.
I can't help but feel that if Ballmer was to annouce his retirement Microsoft's shares would go up.
Microsoft is a good company with lots of intelligent people and cool technology.
The development of vista was disasterious, while the Vista product today is good. I did have a few BSOD and corrupted startup's in the early days of it's release. However this, as others have pointed out has meant that Microsoft got caught out in the netbook market, as they in the mobile phone market.
As good and clever as Dave Cutler is, i think that now he has moved on from the Windows team, a breathe of fresh talent has also been moved in.
Windows 7 will be microsoft coming back fighting and entering the netbook market correctly and not just patching with Windows XP. In the same way i expect the next major release of Windows Mobile will be a lot better due to the competition from apple but also the increased competition from Google and Palm.
Edited 2009-01-12 10:35 UTC
There are three words I never thought I would see together in a sentence: Bill Gates + Charisma.
Charisma is a neutral concept. Bill Gates in my humble opinion has the charisma of a carrot.
Ballmer on the other hand exudes charisma. Note that charisma does not imply "likeable" or "agreeable."
All I hear about Windows 7 is...
"It runs GREAT, really GREAT..."
It makes me skeptical, REALLY skeptical...
I heard similar drivel from Vista, and frankly I will wait until the general public has used Windows 7.
Me I would wager that Windows 7 will NOT RUN great. Why? Because that would be a REAL difference. Up to now each and every Windows operating system has been more bloated than the previous. I have yet to see something else.
And if there is one thing that Microsoft is not getting. I am quite happy with XP... I do use Vista and hate every moment of it.
I have to say that on the same machine as my Vista install there are a couple of areas where it runs much better than Vista. Its not a huge difference but its still noticeable. At home I use OSX and Linux, but at wok I use Vista primarily. However I do have to point out that I have yet to install any real work software on it, which generally slow down the machine considerably.
I was pleased with the very Mac/Dock-like taskbar, imo, it works better than the traditional one because I don't have to mentally group instances of applications if I have multiple windows/sessions open. The only real difference between the OSX approach and the Windows7 approach is that Windows encourages minimizing applications more than OSX. OSX use things like Expose and Spaces to reduce the amount of minimizing. There is also a bit more attention to detail this time around which is much appreciated.
The new taskbar is not in anyway original, and could be seen as an underhanded move by MS by the Mac faithful, but that doesn't detract from the fact that imo its a much needed improvement.





Member since:
2006-08-02
First I'd like to say that Windows 7 runs great on netbooks. I'm a member of the Channel 9 Community and I've read various reports there (and elsewhere) that Windows 7 is great on a netbook. I haven't read a lot of negative reports about Windows 7, not even in the context of limited hardware. On the contrary.
Second, I've met Steve Ballmer in person. I've seen him defend Microsoft in a Q&A with a small group (not more than 40 or 50) of Belgian Microsoft Partners. And although they were Microsoft Partners, the questions were very harsh and to the point. The Ballmer I've seen was very humble and likeable. That's in sharp contrast with his public image. Later that day, I saw him give a keynote to a large group and there I saw him "perform" his "act" of being loud and extravert again.
There's 2 sides to the man, and most people only see 1 side.