Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 11th Jan 2009 23:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 343130
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
There's a difference between wanting to work towards that goal and assuming that you are entitled to it because of the easy cash cows you have been living off for twenty years.
I didn't see much socialism in the parent's comment, and I see we have another moron who thinks they can quote an author as having the perfect answer as many governments have even done worryingly. Ayn Rand's advice on capitalism and how to run it has proved a complete disaster in the current climate, there are elements of social interest that need to be looked after but nationalisation just leads to stagnation.
I really don't know why people look to these so-called philosophers when the world is clearly not that simple. Is socialism right? Is hands-off capitalism right? That's what people are asking now. The simple fact is that no one is right. It depends.
Do you?