Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th Jan 2009 21:35 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Linux Versin 0.17 of the Linux filesystem btrfs has been released. The main news on this release is that it has been included in the Linus' tree. The changes include support of transparent compression, seed devices, improved block sharing while moving extents, improved block allocation and many bug fixes and performance improvements. Also, the disk format is not expected to change unless a critical bug is found.
Thread beginning with comment 343373
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: BTRFS vs ZFS
by Mark Williamson on Wed 14th Jan 2009 01:16 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: BTRFS vs ZFS"
Mark Williamson
Member since:
2005-07-06

Well, so much for "rampant layering violation" complains.


Indeed :-) I've actually been surprised, given those complaints about ZFS, that there hasn't been more (and vocal!) opposition to the Btrfs merge.

That said, maybe the kernel architecture of the two does differ somewhat. I had the impression that the ZFS architecture in Solaris included scope for other filesystems (e.g. UFS) to be implemented effectively as plugins to ZFS. Btrfs certainly doesn't seem to include anything like that, although I'm not entirely clear to what extent ZFS *does* vs *could*.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[5]: BTRFS vs ZFS
by Kebabbert on Wed 14th Jan 2009 09:26 in reply to "RE[4]: BTRFS vs ZFS"
Kebabbert Member since:
2007-07-27

It is quite funny. When some in the Linux camp does some "layering violation" it is ok. But it is not ok that others, such as ZFS, does that.

What is that phenomena called? When you can do stuff, but when others does the same thing - it is a bad thing?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[6]: BTRFS vs ZFS
by StephenBeDoper on Wed 14th Jan 2009 20:43 in reply to "RE[5]: BTRFS vs ZFS"
StephenBeDoper Member since:
2005-07-06

"Back in my day..."

Er, I mean: back in the usenet heyday, we used to call that "PKB" (short for Pot, Kettle, Black).

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[5]: BTRFS vs ZFS
by dvzt on Wed 14th Jan 2009 18:22 in reply to "RE[4]: BTRFS vs ZFS"
dvzt Member since:
2008-10-23

You can create raw volumes from you zpool and than create whatever filesystem on it, including (but not limited to) UFS. But why would you want to do that?

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1