Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th Jan 2009 21:35 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Thread beginning with comment 343373
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.






Member since:
2005-07-06
Indeed :-) I've actually been surprised, given those complaints about ZFS, that there hasn't been more (and vocal!) opposition to the Btrfs merge.
That said, maybe the kernel architecture of the two does differ somewhat. I had the impression that the ZFS architecture in Solaris included scope for other filesystems (e.g. UFS) to be implemented effectively as plugins to ZFS. Btrfs certainly doesn't seem to include anything like that, although I'm not entirely clear to what extent ZFS *does* vs *could*.