Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th Jan 2009 20:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 343695
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Just shows how crooked Apple is.
by BallmerKnowsBest on Sun 18th Jan 2009 14:29
in reply to "RE[3]: Just shows how crooked Apple is."
WGA limits your choice of hardware vendors? Since when?
No it doesn't. But it is a limitation to what you can do with the software you bought. Or licensed. [/q]
Only if you see "inability to do something that's already against copyright law" as a limitation. Hate to break it to you, but Microsoft has a clearly-defined legal right to prevent illegal copying of their OS.
But last I checked, there's nothing in copyright law that says that a software developer has the right to limit users to computers with specific branding. Apple's limitations are much, much more draconian and arbitrary.




Member since:
2008-11-12
Yeah, but they DID install, so they DID enter into a license, thus they ARE bound to its terms which in return means that they DID breach it by installing the OS to non-Apple hardware.
And unless a judge rules that Apple can't limit their software to using it on only their hardware, Wired has not only breached the license but also openly admitted to doing so by posting that article.
No it doesn't. But it is a limitation to what you can do with the software you bought. Or licensed.