Linked by weildish on Tue 20th Jan 2009 02:13 UTC
In the News Those up top (the Presidential Inaugural Committee) chose to utilize Microsoft's Silverlight technology to stream the upcoming inaugural events for the new president of the United States. Though Microsoft certainly likes this idea, this leaves out thousands of people in the US and elsewhere who still cannot run Silverlight or an open source alternative on their systems from viewing the streamed video online. Update by Thom: Linux and PowerPC Mac fans rejoice, as they can watch the inauguration as well using Moonlight. Migel De Icaza wrote: "Microsoft worked late last night to get us access to the code that will be used during the inauguration so we could test it with Moonlight." Microsoft and the Moonlight team fixed this issue in one afternoon, so it might be a little rough.
Thread beginning with comment 344466
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Soooo ....
by testman on Tue 20th Jan 2009 04:12 UTC in reply to "RE: Soooo ...."
testman
Member since:
2007-10-15

"Not true; the girl was seriously retarded and was unable to realize that you do not need MS Word to type or IE to surf the net..."

So it is the end-user's fault again, is it? I'm amazed you can even see us lowly buffoons from up there in your ivory tower.

Reply Parent Score: -1

RE[3]: Soooo ....
by wakeupneo on Tue 20th Jan 2009 07:09 in reply to "RE[2]: Soooo ...."
wakeupneo Member since:
2005-07-06

So it is the end-user's fault again, is it?


...well, if the "end-user" has taken so little time to actually learn anything about the computer they use, to the extent that they think Internet Explorer IS the "Internet" and that MS Word is the only product that can type a letter, then yes...it's their fault.

Something about a bad mechanic blaming his tools comes to mind....

Reply Parent Score: 10

RE[4]: Soooo ....
by AAArno on Tue 20th Jan 2009 09:16 in reply to "RE[3]: Soooo ...."
AAArno Member since:
2008-08-05

"...well, if the "end-user" has taken so little time to actually learn anything about the computer they use, to the extent that they think Internet Explorer IS the "Internet" and that MS Word is the only product that can type a letter, then yes...it's their fault.

Something about a bad mechanic blaming his tools comes to mind....
" equals ivory tower indeed.

Well, this girl is exactly that; not a mechanic. She doesn't give a damn what kind of engine the car is running on. She wants to use word, windows programs and internet explorer and that's it. Most users aren't interested in what a OS is and they're right; they have different priorities.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Soooo ....
by jabbotts on Tue 20th Jan 2009 13:02 in reply to "RE[2]: Soooo ...."
jabbotts Member since:
2007-09-06

Trying to install the Windows version of Word and IE on a non-Windows platform.. sorry.. that is the user's own fault. If the articles (there where a few I read) had indicated that she had did a single internet search for the solution or even asked a friend with an ounce more tech knowledge then fine.. bad little OS. She didn't though.

Tell you what. Throw iWork on your Windows machine then come back and tell us all about how it's not the user's own fault for wondering why the Windows version of IE won't run on any other platforms. (do I get to complain because the osX version of IE won't install on Windows too?)

Reply Parent Score: 5