To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"We have used XP 64 over one year, and with remarkable little problems. Att home I have used xp 64 for more than two years, and I also use Debian linux(sid) 64 bit version"
I think you meant "remarkablY" here, not "remarkable"
It must be the funniest mistake I saw this year!
Edited 2009-01-21 12:46 UTC
It must be the funniest mistake I saw this year! "I have seen" is better English.
Normally I wouldn't correct peoples grammar, however I hate hypocrisy.
If you're going to be pedantic about other people's spelling and grammar, then please ensure your own posts are spotless.
Edited 2009-01-21 17:00 UTC
Either you are not telling the entire story or you do virtually nothing on you windows 64 machines. The 64 bit versions went through a period when it was so unstable unreliable or hardware was just not supported; in all three instances it was largely because of drivers. Don’t get me wrong . . . I make six figures because of Microsoft so I keep my complaining to a minimum. But when people say they went to MS 64bit and had no problems there is a reason as stated in the beginning of my post.
XP x64 gets confused by DVD-RAM optical drives...especially the newer ones. Also there is currently no painless way of getting VPN (Cisco) to work on that OS. Other than that, and the fact that a lot of electronics manufacturers do not make drivers for that OS (Canon, et al) I think its a damn fine OS. There are alternatives to all those problems I mentioned but still its a solid OS. It has gotten a lot better than the situation was 2 years ago for that OS that is for sure.





Member since:
2005-11-27
We have used XP 64 over one year, and with remarkable little problems. Att home I have used xp 64 for more than two years, and I also use Debian linux(sid) 64 bit version