Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 21st Jan 2009 11:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 344734
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I guess I misunderstood all of the talk about Snow Leopard from when I was following the news about it more aggressively back when 10.5.3 was new stuff. Can't say I'm not disappointed that a company with little to lose by pushing things forward wouldn't take the chance to do so. Xslimmer does sound pretty neat though, wish I had a system to run it on. 
RE[3]: Comment by OddFox
by kaiwai on Thu 22nd Jan 2009 12:13
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by OddFox"
I guess I misunderstood all of the talk about Snow Leopard from when I was following the news about it more aggressively back when 10.5.3 was new stuff. Can't say I'm not disappointed that a company with little to lose by pushing things forward wouldn't take the chance to do so. Xslimmer does sound pretty neat though, wish I had a system to run it on.
Xslimmer is horrible; if I had a dollar for every person who has buggered up their system because of it - I'd be able to buy a McDonalds franchise.
The illusion being sold it uses less memory (which is a crock), loads faster (another crock). The only semi-truth is uses less hard disk space; sorry, given that one can buy a big ass drive, the risk of screwing up a system simply to save a few megabytes is pretty pitiful.





Member since:
2005-11-10
Fat binaries will not be going away, Apple have just simply modified the OS Installer to strip unneeded binaries from the system during installation.
The same effective slimmer size can be achieved in Leoprd by running a binary thinner like XSlimmer or monolingual.
Snow Leopard will also be 32-bit as well (to work on Feb-06 32-bit CoreDuo Macs), the difference is that on a 64-bit machine, a 64-bit Kernel and drivers will be used.