To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well written reviews are always useful no matter if your tastes lines up with the reviewer or not. A good reviewer not only says whether he likes something or not, but also why. I have no problem reading a well written review where the reviewer is claiming that a game is the best he's played all year and at the same time conclude that I'll probably not like the game.
A well written review should give you enough basis to make your own informed decision about a product, no matter what the reviewer thought of the product.
The only well-written reviews I've seen are the ones on insomna.ac. Most New Game Journalists hate Alex Kierkegaard because he's got a pompous attitude and has a rather harsh and direct use of language, but IMO he's one of the only good reviewers around.
The rest is all crap. New Game Journalists' reviews suck, and this review is not an exception. Alex at least understands what games are and how is one supposed to review them. This reads more like an opinion on JRPGs than a game review (and Alex would tell you straight away how reviewing across genres makes no sense at all).
Edited 2009-01-22 12:50 UTC





Member since:
2005-06-29
Of course I'm not. Who ever said I was? Just because I'm not as entertaining as Yahtzee, I'm somehow not entitled to write game reviews?
Yahtzee is entertainment, and he's pretty damn good at it. However, I want my game reviews to actually be useful.