Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Jan 2009 12:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 344958
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: This just goes to show
by spiderman on Thu 22nd Jan 2009 15:22
in reply to "RE[5]: This just goes to show"
It is not only prio art that invalidates a patent. Obviousness does also invalidate a patent.
Let say I get an effective way to track eye movements with a webcam. I could patent the idea to use this eye tracker as a pointing device, but this would quickly be invalidated. Not because of prior art (I'm the first to track eye, so I'm the first who can use that as a pointing device), but because it is obvious.
RE[7]: This just goes to show
by lurch_mojoff on Thu 22nd Jan 2009 15:48
in reply to "RE[6]: This just goes to show"
RE[7]: This just goes to show
by Adurbe on Thu 22nd Jan 2009 15:52
in reply to "RE[6]: This just goes to show"
RE[7]: This just goes to show
by Soulbender on Thu 22nd Jan 2009 16:10
in reply to "RE[6]: This just goes to show"





Member since:
2005-07-06
the mouse has become ubiquitous BUT dont forget someone DID invent the 'move mouse right, pointer moves right' functionality. The inventor (in my opinion) should have the right to protect that invention and the r+d invested into its creation (this is primarily served by patents and copyright)
Remember that with all patents, if you can prove prior art then that patent becomes void
if you can find an example where "apple's pinch" was used before (as described in the patent) please publish it
Macworld previously had a feature on apple taking advantage of this patent 'way back' in 2007
http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/index.cfm?RSS&NewsID=18340