Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 22nd Jan 2009 12:04 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 344997
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: This just goes to show
by bnolsen on Thu 22nd Jan 2009 19:34
in reply to "RE[2]: This just goes to show"
There's also the little bit about there being actual hardware schematics to precisely describe and show what was done here.
It's very arguable that these "multi touch" patents are algorithm only.
Why should touchpad manufacturers be punished by apple choosing to limit how their touchpads are used? Where's the innovation in that?
And how would a company be motivated to manufacture *anything* if some other company can patent how the device is used and lock out their potential customer base?
Edited 2009-01-22 19:40 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-06
the radio was already invented, as was the winding mechanism.
the 'invention' was still his to patent as he proposed a new way of using those technoligies together
His ‘invention’ was a better method of producing energy from winding. That is the only thing that his patent should be able to cover.
If you invent another method for doing the same thing, it’s a new invention and not covered…
At least, that’s the original intention of patents