To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That is why patents must be enforced via the courts.
A court will decide if the patent was indeed an invention which deserves protection or a waste of paper and the courts time.
Out of hand assuming the particular patent is 'vague' is a dis-service to what may me a highly technical and specific invention developed by apple staff
highly technical? How did apple engineers get their hands on a pre so that they could determine any infringement?
Apple is just talking crap in order to intimidate. I would be willing to accept if it was a blatant copy (ie the meizu m8 or whatever). However, apple has seemingly left them (meizu) alone and are only going against palm because they have created a product that potentially can usurp the iphone's crown.
Edited 2009-01-25 23:13 UTC





Member since:
2008-03-17
I guess many of the negative comments here stem from the fact that none of us really see what patents of apple's palm is infringing.
And if palm is in fact infringing on an apple patent, that patent is probably horribly vague and generally harmful to the industry and not just protective of apple ip.