Linked by weildish on Sat 24th Jan 2009 22:44 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 345450
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-10-23
I believe it is not about Anglo/Saxon vs China. If you go that way, you have to look at the whole story. China didn't invade tibet because they didn't have software patents. Look, Hitler was vegetarian, do you see what you will become if you are vegetarian? China's economy and Anglo/Saxon economies are more complex than that.
Just pointing out that China didn't do software patents and failed doesn't mean removing software patents will make you fail.
Edited 2009-01-25 21:35 UTC