To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
come on now
you cant dismiss an entire legal system because you happen to dislike patents!
The concepts like innocent until proven guilty and the concept of prison being for rehabilitaion and not punishments are great things
To dismiss an institution such as the US legal system in such a complacent manner has, to me, completly undermined any credibility in you or the argument you put forward.
I will happily continue to debate patents but I no longer belive it to be appropriate to do so with yourself
p.s I am not American
Especially a society as litigious as the US, you think cramming courts with the task of reviewing junk patents that could have easily been disqualified by the patent office is a good idea. We should have non-technical judges presiding over detailed technological debates? How has that worked out so far?





Member since:
2005-07-06
you are undoubtedly correct
If palm released something that would not sell then im sure apple would not be interested.
it is not for me (nor you) to speculate how apple got hold of a pre to make the decision. Neither of us know and it wont further the argument of either of us.
What I don't understand is all those here at OS news insisting patents should not be used. If, as seems to be a common claim, the patents are unenforceable let it go to court. The US legal system generally is held in quite high regard. The decision on a case such as this (which I understand to be GUI related) would establish once and for all the status of patents in software and in particular software interfaces